Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/5959
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Fong-Gong-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Rain-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-01T08:34:56Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-01T08:34:56Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1084 (Online); 0022-4456 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5959-
dc.description817-822en_US
dc.description.abstractReuse and abuse of syringes has led to cross-infection of diseases. Usability evaluation of three of the most commonly used safety syringe types conducted in this study is through-push retract breakable safety syringe, rotary plunger retractable safety syringe and release-ring breakable safety syringe. By administering Safety Feature Evaluation Form (SFEF) and Focus Group Interviews on six professional nurses with an average professional experience over 11 years, usability problems with three types of safety syringe are found out. Six design principles have been ascertained and applied in development of a new safety syringe design, with input from a number of designers, nursing professionals and occupational safety technicians. New safety syringe significantly outperformed existing safety syringes on all evaluation indices.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCSIRen_US
dc.sourceJSIR Vol.68(09) [September 2009]en_US
dc.subjectFocus group interviewsen_US
dc.subjectNeedlestick injuriesen_US
dc.subjectSafety feature evaluation form (SFEF)en_US
dc.subjectSafety syringesen_US
dc.titleApplication of safety feature evaluation in single-use safety syringe designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:JSIR Vol.68(09) [September 2009]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JSIR 68(9) 817-822.pdf110.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.