Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Prashasti-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Vivek Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorArora, Parveen-
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Sujit-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1084 (Online); 0022-4456 (Print)-
dc.description.abstractIndia is emerging as a major knowledge producer of the world in terms of proportionate share of global research output and the overall research productivity rank. Many recent reports, both of commissioned studies from Government of India as well as independent international agencies, show India at different ranks of global research productivity (variations as large as from 3rd to 9th place). The paper examines this contradiction; tries to analyse as to why different reports place India at different ranks and what may be the reasons thereof. The research output data for India, along with the ten most productive countries in the world, is analysed from three major scholarly databases- Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions for this purpose. Results show that both, the endogenous factors (such as database coverage variation and different subject classification schemes) and the exogenous factors (such as subject selection and publication counting methodology) cause the variations in different reports. This paper focuses mainly on the first factor- variations due to use of data from different databases. The policy implications of the study are also discussed.en_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceJSIR Vol.80(04) [April 2021]en_US
dc.subjectIndian Researchen_US
dc.subjectResearch Performanceen_US
dc.subjectScholarly Databasesen_US
dc.subjectWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.titleIndia’s Rank and Global Share in Scientific Research: How Data Sourced from Different Databases Can Produce Varying Outcomes?en_US
Appears in Collections:JSIR Vol.80(04) [April 2021]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JSIR 80(4) 336-346.pdf761.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.