Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Compulsory Licences Imbroglio: Provisions Under TRIPS and Their Interpretations|
|Authors:||Nair, M D|
public health issues
|Abstract:||<smarttagtype namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="country-region"><smarttagtype namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="place"> One of the most crucial components of the TRIPS Agreement is related to the provision for the grant of compulsory licences, which is not in fact a new phenomenon introduced under the TRIPS Agreement. Practically all countries including US, Canada and those in Western Europe had provisions for grant of compulsory licences in their Patent Acts and have used them on several occasions in the past. A proper understanding and a judicious interpretation of the available provisions for compulsory licences under the TRIPS Agreement could go a long way in ensuring a proper balance between the rights of the patent holder and the public health needs of the people in developing countries. The paper discusses in detail about the compulsory licence and the need for granting it. Amendments to the Indian Patents Act 1970 on compulsory licence issues are also discussed briefly. </smarttagtype></smarttagtype>|
|ISSN:||0975-1076 (Online); 0971-7544 (Print)|
|Appears in Collections:||JIPR Vol.09(5) [September 2004]|
Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.