Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/28929
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Sharifa Sayma-
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T10:47:17Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-05T10:47:17Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1076 (Online); 0971-7544 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/28929-
dc.description223-228en_US
dc.description.abstractCommercial success of a product nowadays largely depends upon its attractiveness and visual appeal. Design nourishes creativity in the industrial and manufacturing sector and thereby helps to expand commercial activities ultimately leading to economic development. For this reason companies use intellectual property laws to protect industrial designs which are important tools for branding. Brand names affirmed by industrial designs have become the most important strategic factor for an increasing number of companies. This article explains how intellectual property laws protect design and compares different design protection systems in the US, the EU, Australia and Japan. This evaluation shows that design protection is considerably different amongst these four developed countries. The article also highlights some of the most important cases relating to industrial design in these jurisdictions. These four countries account for a significant number of design registrations and applications globally. Moreover, these countries have innovated and developed the industrial design protection system which entails that a rigorous comparison of these design systems could provide valuable insights for other jurisdictions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceJIPR Vol.19(3) [May 2014]en_US
dc.subjectIndustrial designen_US
dc.subjectdesign patenten_US
dc.subjectSui generis lawen_US
dc.subjectCoherent design protectionen_US
dc.titleIndustrial Design in Different Jurisdictions: A Comparison of Lawsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:JIPR Vol.19(3) [May 2014]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JIPR 19(3) 223-228.pdf76.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.