Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBasu, G-
dc.contributor.authorRoy, A N-
dc.contributor.authorMajumder, A-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, S N-
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, A-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1025 (Online); 0971-0426 (Print)-
dc.description.abstractHairiness of wrap-spun and conventionally-spun (both slip draft and apron draft) jute yarns has been determined by ‘integral’ and ‘discrete’ methods. The integral method, based on Uster yarn hairiness index, measures the ‘total hairiness’ of the yarn while the discrete method, based on counting the number of protruding fibres of different hair lengths, measures the ‘long hairiness’ of the yarns. It is found that both ‘total’ and ‘long’ hairiness of wrap-spun jute yarns are appreciably lower than those of conventionally-spun jute yarns. When the data of wrap-spun and conventionally-spun jute yarns are pooled, the correlation coefficient between integral and discrete methods is positive and significant, but no relationship can be established when the results of only wrap-spun yarn are considered. This is due to the difference in the structures of wrap-spun and conventionally-spun jute yarns. In the case of wrap-spun jute yarn which was wrapped by either monofilament or multi filaments, the structure of the staple fibre assembly is close, compact, parallel and smooth while in the case of conventionally-spun jute yarn, the staple fibre assembly is open, bulky, helical and fuzzy.en_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJFTR Vol.24(3) [September 1999]en_US
dc.subjectDiscrete methoden_US
dc.subjectIntegral methoden_US
dc.subjectJute yarnen_US
dc.subjectUster hairiness indexen_US
dc.subjectWrap-spun yarnen_US
dc.titleMeasurement of hairiness of jute yarns by discrete and integral methodsen_US
Appears in Collections:IJFTR Vol.24(3) [September 1999]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJFTR 24(3) 177-182.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.