NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository

Research Journals >
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) >
JIPR Vol.13 [2008] >
JIPR Vol.13(5) [September 2008] >

Title: What’s ‘New’? - Isn’t it Obvious?
Authors: Ohly, D Christopher
Keywords: Therapeutic efficacy
Patentable subject matter
Inventive step
Issue Date: Sep-2008
Publisher: CSIR
Abstract: A new approach to Section 3(d) of Indian patent law using common principles of statutory construction suggests that Section 3(d) should be viewed as a proviso to the general definition of an invention in the Indian Patents Act. As such Section 3(d) should be strictly construed. The term ‘mere discovery’ should encompass only natural things merely observed and not non-natural substances that result from human endeavour. The term ‘efficacy’ used as an exception to the proviso should be broadly construed to include more than ‘therapeutic efficacy’. Construed in this traditional manner Section 3(d) may well comply with TRIPS.
Page(s): 498-508
ISSN: 0971-5544
Source:JIPR Vol.13(5) [September 2008]

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
JIPR 13(5) 498-508.pdf149.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
 Current Page Visits: 1012 
Recommend this item


Online Submission of Articles |  NISCAIR Website |  National Knowledge Resources Consortium |  Contact us |  Feedback

Disclaimer: NISCAIR assumes no responsibility for the statements and opinions advanced by contributors. The editorial staff in its work of examining papers received for publication is helped, in an honorary capacity, by many distinguished engineers and scientists.

CC License Except where otherwise noted, the Articles on this site are licensed under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India

Copyright © 2015 The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi. All rights reserved.

Powered by DSpace Copyright © 2002-2007 MIT and Hewlett-Packard | Compliant to OAI-PMH V 2.0

Home Page Total Visits: 169671 since 01-Sep-2015  Last updated on 30-Jun-2016Webmaster: