Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Patent Trolls: Legit Enforcers or Harrassers?|
|Keywords:||Patent troll;Non-practicing entity;Patent squatter;Patent pirate;Non-manufacturing patentee;Patent shark;Patent asserter;Patent dealer|
|Abstract:||Since the turn of the century, ‘patent trolls’ have emerged as one of the most topical debates among patent holders. However, nearly ten years later, stakeholders are still unable to reach consensus as to the ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ of ‘trolls’. Against this backdrop, our debates open with the landmark case of Blackberry between RIM and NTP to provide thoughts as to whether NTP is considered a troll. Then there is a focus on some conceptual issues surrounding ‘patent trolls’, and its origin citing relevant mini-cases. This column also lays out the fierce arguments for or against patent trolling among scholars and practitioners and reasoning for the trolling existence. The debates end with some reflections on the implication of patent trolling phenomenon on patent systems, particularly the US structure, subsequently, proposing some relevant solutions.|
|ISSN:||0975-1076 (Online); 0971-7544 (Print)|
|Appears in Collections:||JIPR Vol.17(6) [November 2012]|
Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.