NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository

Research Journals >
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) >
JIPR Vol.17 [2012] >
JIPR Vol.17(4) [July 2012] >

Title: Exhausting Copyrights and Promoting Access to Education: An Empirical Take
Authors: Basheer, Shamnad
Khettry, Debanshu
Nandy, Shambo
Mitra, Sree
Keywords: Parallel import
Doctrine of exhaustion
Publishing industry
Issue Date: Jul-2012
Publisher: NISCAIR-CSIR, India
Abstract:   In what must rate as a momentous occasion in Indian copyright history, the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2012 cleared both Houses of Parliament after 12 years of intense debate, discussion and politicking. These set of amendments were particularly celebrated for fostering social justice through provisions that included a special copyright exception for the disabled and a mandatory royalty sharing arrangement for hitherto exploited Bollywood artists.

  However, despite the general euphoria surrounding the passage of these highly progressive provisions, there are causes for concern. In particular, the abrupt deletion of a clause legalising parallel imports, contrary to the suggestion of an expert Parliamentary Committee, raised many an eyebrow. It would appear that publisher lobbies prevailed upon the government to effect this last minute volte-face. The main claim advanced by publishers to effectuate this change of heart was that the Indian market was well served with the latest books at affordable prices, rendering redundant the very need for a provision legalising parallel imports.

  In this paper, the authors limit themselves to empirically testing this claim. The data from three different libraries demonstrate that the Indian versions sold by international publishing houses are often old and outdated editions. The latest versions are available only through imports via websites (or through mainstream distributors) and costs as much, or more than their western counterparts. Further, the legality of such imports is uncertain under the present copyright regime.

  Based on this evidence, the authors argue in favour of retaining Section 2(m) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. They also argue that legal policy ought to favour free market competition, unless the evidence suggests that the gains from such competition are outweighed by the harm to the copyright owner and the growth of the indigenous publishing sector. As of today, no such countervailing evidence has been proffered.
Page(s): 335-347
CC License:  CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India
ISSN: 0975-1076 (Online); 0971-7544 (Print)
Source:JIPR Vol.17(4) [July 2012]

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
JIPR 17(4) 335-347.pdf128.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
 Current Page Visits: 118 
Recommend this item


Online Submission of Articles |  NISCAIR Website |  National Knowledge Resources Consortium |  Contact us |  Feedback

Disclaimer: NISCAIR assumes no responsibility for the statements and opinions advanced by contributors. The editorial staff in its work of examining papers received for publication is helped, in an honorary capacity, by many distinguished engineers and scientists.

CC License Except where otherwise noted, the Articles on this site are licensed under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India

Copyright © 2015 The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi. All rights reserved.

Powered by DSpace Copyright © 2002-2007 MIT and Hewlett-Packard | Compliant to OAI-PMH V 2.0

Home Page Total Visits: 167623 since 01-Sep-2015  Last updated on 28-Jun-2016Webmaster: