<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository Collection: JIPR Vol.14(5) [September 2009]</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/6052</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>TRIPS, WTO and IPR – DOHA Round &amp; Public Health</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/6064</link>
      <description>Title: TRIPS, WTO and IPR – DOHA Round &amp; Public Health
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Nair, M D
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 446-447</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Case Law Developments</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/6063</link>
      <description>Title: IP Case Law Developments
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Thomas, Zakir
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This article attempts to summarize some of the recently reported cases on&#xD;
intellectual property law to enable readers to understand how the Courts have&#xD;
applied the principles of intellectual property law to actual IP disputes. In this article, widely discussed cases on,&#xD;
copyright law and patent law are covered
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 437-445</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Impact of Patents on Indian Pharma Industry’s Growth and Competency: A Viewpoint of Pharmaceutical Companies in India</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/6061</link>
      <description>Title: Impact of Patents on Indian Pharma Industry’s Growth and Competency: A Viewpoint of Pharmaceutical Companies in India
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Janodia, Manthan D; Rao, J Venkata; Pandey, Sureshwar; Sreedhar, D; Ligade, Virendra S; Udupa, N
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: &lt;smarttagtype namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="country-region"&gt;&lt;smarttagtype namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="place"&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
Instruments&#xD;
of intellectual property rights (IPR) are considered to achieve economic,&#xD;
social and technological advancement for a country in all aspects. Of all the&#xD;
instruments of IPR, patent is the most contentious issue which is deliberated&#xD;
in several international fora. Patents are mostly debated for their role in&#xD;
pharmaceutical field. India&#xD;
signed General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1994 agreeing to&#xD;
implement the IPR in all fields of technology, including product patent, with&#xD;
effect from 1 January 1995. Taking into account India’s&#xD;
status as a developing country, India&#xD;
was granted a transition period of ten years from 1995 to 2005 to switch over&#xD;
from process patent to product patent. With this shift, it was imperative for&#xD;
Indian pharmaceutical companies to embrace product patents. This study was&#xD;
undertaken with the objective of identifying the situation in India after&#xD;
product patent regime was implemented. The role of Indian pharmaceutical&#xD;
companies in the era of product patent is crucial. The authors attempted to&#xD;
identify how Indian pharmaceutical companies view product patent regime,&#xD;
hindering the growth of industry or providing impetus to R&amp;amp;D, in this study.&#xD;
The measures taken by these companies to survive and grow in product patent&#xD;
regime have also been analysed&lt;/smarttagtype&gt;&lt;/smarttagtype&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 432-436</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patent Specification: Engineering the Technical Output of Novel Invention</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/6060</link>
      <description>Title: Patent Specification: Engineering the Technical Output of Novel Invention
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Baruah, Anjana
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The contents of a patent specification, also called as ‘the disclosure’,&#xD;
are the ‘written description’ of an invention. The layout of specification&#xD;
varies from place to place, however the essence of contents of specification is&#xD;
same throughout the world, because disclosure of specification is the basis to&#xD;
establish novelty and non obviousness of an invention which is essential to get&#xD;
grant of a patent. Moreover if any dispute arises, the Court of Law would&#xD;
settle the case based on contents of specification. Section 10 of Indian Patents&#xD;
(Amendment) Act, 2005 defines contents of specification; although it is not an&#xD;
exhaustive guideline to patent applicants, it gives an outline as to the layout&#xD;
of specification to express the technical output of invention into written&#xD;
description. Patent specification is equivalent to a scientific research&#xD;
article as both are written descriptions of inventions except the fact that&#xD;
patent specification is a techno legal document and the description of&#xD;
specification should establish novelty and non-obviousness of an invention.&#xD;
Therefore, as compared to scientific research article, description of patent&#xD;
specification is more comprehensive and requires some more elements to disclose&#xD;
invention. With the advent of Internet, granted patent specifications are available&#xD;
at free databases or websites of some Patent Offices. Patent statute and patent&#xD;
documents which are available on Internet provide vital guideline to transform&#xD;
novel invention into technical contents of patent specification. This article&#xD;
describes the statutes and the practice that may be regarded as guidelines to&#xD;
disclose an invention in a patent specification
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 423-431</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

