<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository Collection: JIPR Vol.16(6) [November 2011]</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13054</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Biodiversity Protection – A Critical Issue</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13062</link>
      <description>Title: TRIPS, WTO and IPR: Biodiversity Protection – A Critical Issue
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Nair, M D
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The World Trade Organization (WTO) was set&#xD;
up in 1995 and has been the custodian of all matters related to the&#xD;
implementation of the TRIPS Agreement endorsed by 153 member countries. WTO is&#xD;
therefore the most important body which monitors and influences working of&#xD;
global intellectual property rights protection in all its member countries.&#xD;
This opinion discusses the critical issue of biodiversity protection.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 519-521</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Role of Europe in the Development of Related Rights Laws</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13061</link>
      <description>Title: The Role of Europe in the Development of Related Rights Laws
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Cook, Trevor
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: As a European intellectual property lawyer,&#xD;
the author is often struck by the amount of comparative analysis in the area of&#xD;
intellectual property which adopts US intellectual property laws, rather than&#xD;
European ones, as their point of comparison. This seems strange when in many&#xD;
respects US intellectual property laws have their own unique features and when&#xD;
European such laws are often more closely aligned with the laws of most other&#xD;
countries in the world. This series of articles aims to expand knowledge of and&#xD;
to explain something of European intellectual property laws; how they got to&#xD;
their present state, what are current hot topics in them, where they are&#xD;
heading and why they matter. This second article in the series will focus on&#xD;
related rights.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 516-518</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing the Role of Ayurvedic ‘Bhasms’ as Ethno-nanomedicine in the Metal Based Nanomedicine Patent Regime</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13060</link>
      <description>Title: Assessing the Role of Ayurvedic ‘Bhasms’ as Ethno-nanomedicine in the Metal Based Nanomedicine Patent Regime
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Paul, Sanjeeta; Chugh, Archana
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The traditional&#xD;
medicine system is gaining wider popularity in the present times leading to&#xD;
increase in its commercialization at an international level. The present study&#xD;
is an attempt to analyse various facets of the patent regime of metal-based&#xD;
contemporary nanomedicine, with focus on Ayurvedic ‘Bhasms’ (alternative&#xD;
traditional medicine) used for various disease treatments. The study proposes a&#xD;
new dimension of understanding of Ayurvedic Bhasms as ethno-nanomedicine in the&#xD;
surging era of nanomedicine. The study proposes to have organized open-sourcing&#xD;
of the knowledge associated with Ayurvedic Bhasms, so that both, the&#xD;
ethno-nanomedicine as well as the emerging metal-based nanomedicine systems can&#xD;
co-exist symbiotically, thereby preventing misuse of traditional knowledge and&#xD;
promoting cumulative benefit to mankind.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 509-515</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rebirth of Opt-in System in Copyright: Analysis in the Light of  ‘Google Books’ Controversy</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13059</link>
      <description>Title: Rebirth of Opt-in System in Copyright: Analysis in the Light of  ‘Google Books’ Controversy
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Ahmad, Tabrez; Choudhury, Pratik Priyadarshi
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The recent copyright controversy, the Google&#xD;
Books litigation, has revived interest in the role that opt-in requirements can&#xD;
play in copyright law. Google Books sought to make every book in the English&#xD;
language text-searchable. To realize this goal, however, Google intended to&#xD;
scan the text of each such book – thereby making a copy – the right to which&#xD;
was vested in different persons around the world. This number of persons&#xD;
amounted to millions and gaining access to all was an onerous task. So, when&#xD;
the company failed to get permission from all the copyright owners, it gave two&#xD;
options to the authors either to opt-out of the copyright or agree to it by as&#xD;
per the result of a class action litigation. In both these circumstances, the&#xD;
user of the copyright had the right to exploit, without authorization, unless&#xD;
the copyright holder took affirmative action. It is the essence of opt-in&#xD;
system in copyright which reared its head once more along with this&#xD;
controversy. This paper critically examines the protection regime in copyright&#xD;
law and the philosophy of protection given to any author over his/her original&#xD;
creation in the light of the above mentioned controversy bearing a potential&#xD;
impact over the fair use doctrine in copyright law. In the present context of&#xD;
highly digitalized society, the dilemma is whether an opt-out system is the&#xD;
need of the hour or the opt-in system should regain its place.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 500-508</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

