<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository Collection: JIPR Vol.16(2) [March 2011]</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11562</link>
    <description>&lt;b&gt;Special Issue on IPR and Agriculture (Guest Editor: Dr. Sudhir Kochhar)&lt;/b&gt;</description>
    
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Role of Freedom to Operate in Business with Proprietary Products</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11580</link>
      <description>Title: Role of Freedom to Operate in Business with Proprietary Products
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Sandal, Nidhi; Kumar, Avinash
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: A comprehensive&#xD;
Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis requires analysing all forms of valid&#xD;
intellectual property (IP) rights and associated agreements and contracts to&#xD;
ensure that development or launch of any particular product/process in a&#xD;
particular market, in a particular country does not infringe any IP right of&#xD;
third party. FTO opinion is usually a legal advice; however, R&amp;D&#xD;
organizations engaged in frequent patenting may also need to develop their&#xD;
in-house capability for &#xD;
FTO analysis. This paper illustrates methodology for FTO analysis, limited to&#xD;
patent rights.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 204-209</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Circumventing Complex Intellectual Property Hurdles to Enable Access to Proven Upstream Technology for Poverty Alleviation and Benefiting  Resource Poor Farmers: Case Studies</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11579</link>
      <description>Title: Circumventing Complex Intellectual Property Hurdles to Enable Access to Proven Upstream Technology for Poverty Alleviation and Benefiting  Resource Poor Farmers: Case Studies
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Vijayaraghavan, K; Akshat, M; Shruthi, A; Chiranth, C R
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Licensing of technologies by&#xD;
companies and research institutes is a recent phenomenon that has gained immense popularity in the agricultural&#xD;
sector, it being imperative for the research fraternity to gain access&#xD;
to validated technologies, enhance their product portfolio, and accelerate&#xD;
access to commercialization ensuring outreach of good science to farmers. Two&#xD;
case studies pertaining to rice and chickpea are discussed in the paper to&#xD;
elucidate this process.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 200-203</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Managing Intellectual Property for Agriculture Inventions in the University</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11578</link>
      <description>Title: Managing Intellectual Property for Agriculture Inventions in the University
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Sidhu, Arshdeep Kaur
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: One essential function&#xD;
of a technology transfer office is the proactive management of intellectual&#xD;
property related to crops and germplasm. Most of the agriculture stations and&#xD;
universities over the world have established technology transfer offices to&#xD;
protect their own plant varieties all over the world. This paper focuses on the patent policies,&#xD;
technology transfer policies and special practices within the office of&#xD;
technology commercialization at the University&#xD;
 of California, which, by some measures, is the largest public technology&#xD;
transfer program in the world
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 194-199</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Challenge of Intellectual Property Enforcement for Agriculture Technology Transfers, Additives, Raw Materials, and Finished Goods against Product Fraud and Counterfeiters</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11577</link>
      <description>Title: The Challenge of Intellectual Property Enforcement for Agriculture Technology Transfers, Additives, Raw Materials, and Finished Goods against Product Fraud and Counterfeiters
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Spink, John
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: One&#xD;
often-overlooked aspect of intellectual property rights (IPR) strategy is the&#xD;
deterrence and enforcement against ‘irresponsible defendants’ including product&#xD;
counterfeiters. When applied to food, the consumer product fraud or product&#xD;
counterfeiting is referred to as food fraud, or economically motivated&#xD;
adulteration. While this problem is not unique &#xD;
to agriculture and food products, there are special circumstances and issues to&#xD;
consider. The objectives of this paper are to: (1) review the underlying fraud&#xD;
opportunities (complex and on a massive scale), including an exploration of&#xD;
types of fraudsters and types of fraud (near infinite); (2) review how&#xD;
globalization and source economies contribute to the problem; (3) review the&#xD;
complexity and challenges of enforcement for companies and agencies; and (4)&#xD;
introduce the ‘chemistry of the crime’ or the ‘crime triangle’, to shift the&#xD;
focus from reactionary intervention and response to proactive prevention. Five&#xD;
applicable case studies are included, bringing insights on the irresponsible&#xD;
nature of many of the fraudsters. Through its review of fraudsters and types of&#xD;
fraud, this study will provide information to assist with IP technology&#xD;
transfers and the effective enforcement of IPR. Product counterfeiting often&#xD;
poses a very serious public health and economic threat to agriculture and food&#xD;
products. There are very motivated, intelligent, resilient and aggressive&#xD;
fraudsters, but they can be deterred by companies or agencies focused on&#xD;
reducing fraud opportunities. Standard business practices—even identified best&#xD;
practices—often inadvertently contribute to fraud opportunities.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 183-193</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

