<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository Community: ALIS Vol.58 [2011]</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11531</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Community's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Citations in &lt;i&gt;Annals of Library and Information Studies &lt;/i&gt;during 1997 to 2010:A study</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13485</link>
      <description>Title: Citations in &lt;i&gt;Annals of Library and Information Studies &lt;/i&gt;during 1997 to 2010:A study
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Deshmukh, Prashant P.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Analysis of 4141 citations appended to&#xD;
articles in volumes 44 to 57 of &lt;i&gt;Annals of Library&#xD;
and Information Studies &lt;/i&gt;shows that the source journal is&#xD;
the most cited. The half life of LIS literature is found to be 9 years for&#xD;
journals and 14 years for books respectively. The core periodicals as per the&#xD;
4141 citations have been listed according to the productivity.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 355-361</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Conference proceedings as a source of information in LIS research in India: A study based on citations</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13484</link>
      <description>Title: Conference proceedings as a source of information in LIS research in India: A study based on citations
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Rajgoli, Iqbalahmad U
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Twelve&#xD;
thousand five hundred and thirty six references appended to 1012 papers&#xD;
published in four Indian LIS journals for the period 2002-2010 revealed that&#xD;
there are 999 conference papers in all with an average of 0.99 conference paper&#xD;
per paper. Journal articles have emerged as the most important source of&#xD;
information among all the four journals followed by Web resources, books and&#xD;
conference proceedings. A ranked list of highly cited conferences is also&#xD;
prepared.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 346-354</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Matthew effect and a relation with concept symbols and defaults</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13483</link>
      <description>Title: The Matthew effect and a relation with concept symbols and defaults
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Mahbuba, Dilruba; Rousseau, Ronald
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: In this article a review of Merton’s article&#xD;
about the Matthew effect is presented. The authors discuss what they think&#xD;
Merton really meant and link it to the use of concept symbols and defaults. The&#xD;
Matthew effect is linked to the notions of concept symbols and defaults. The&#xD;
diffusion of Merton’s ideas in science over time is discussed. Several h- and&#xD;
R-indices related to “Matthew” publications are derived. Related effects,&#xD;
namely the Podunk effect, the Knudop effect and the Wehttam effect are briefly&#xD;
discussed. Also the Matilda effect is given some attention as is the under&#xD;
representation of women in science and factors explaining this phenomenon.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 335-345</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A study of citation accuracy in psychology theses submitted to the University of Mysore</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13482</link>
      <description>Title: A study of citation accuracy in psychology theses submitted to the University of Mysore
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Harinarayana, N. S.; Chikkamanju; Vasantha, Raju N
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This&#xD;
paper is an attempt to examine the accuracy of references in five psychology&#xD;
theses submitted to the University&#xD;
 of Mysore. Nine hundred&#xD;
and twenty three references were verified for their accuracy. Seventy seven&#xD;
percent of the references had citation errors. The errors were classified as&#xD;
major and minor errors. The major errors included incorrect journal names,&#xD;
articles titles, author and citations such as wrong volumes, issues, years and&#xD;
page numbers. Minor errors included: punctuations, incomplete article titles,&#xD;
and incomplete author names. The study found that 39.54 percent of the&#xD;
references contained major errors. Misspelling author(s) name (21.77%),&#xD;
misspelling of titles (37.93%), mistakes in volume (5.76%) and issue numbers&#xD;
(1.15%), mistakes in year (37.66%) and page numbers (62.33%) were kinds of&#xD;
major errors found in the study. Lack of awareness about referencing techniques&#xD;
and lack of diligence in compilation of bibliography are the reasons for such&#xD;
errors. This study suggest for imparting training for young researcher to&#xD;
follow appropriate reference styles and maintain the accuracy of the&#xD;
references.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 326-334</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

