<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository Collection: JSIR Vol.70(03) [March 2011]</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11084</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Effects of advanced injection timing on performance and emission of a supercharged dual-fuel diesel engine fueled by producer gas fromdowndraft gasifier</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11094</link>
      <description>Title: Effects of advanced injection timing on performance and emission of a supercharged dual-fuel diesel engine fueled by producer gas fromdowndraft gasifier
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Hassan, S; Zainal, Z A; Miskam, M A
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This study presents effects of advanced injection timing on engine performance and emission characteristics of a super charged producer gas-diesel dual fuel diesel engine fueled by producer gas from a downdraft gasifier. Original injection timing of engine was 14° before top dead center (BTDC), and tests were conducted at advanced three different injection timings (17°, 20°,and 23°) by changing thickness of copper shim. Experiments were carried out at a constant injection pressure (2 bar) with varying injection flow rates of both producer gas and air at different engine speeds and loads. Advancing injection timing in as uper charged engine showed that diesel fuel displacement and brake thermal efficiency increased, with a significant reduction in carbon monoxide emission and specific energy consumption compared with original injection timing of premixed producer gas diesel dual fuel.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 220-224</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treatment of textile effluent by fly ash and reusing of colour adsorbed fly ash</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11093</link>
      <description>Title: Treatment of textile effluent by fly ash and reusing of colour adsorbed fly ash
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Chandrasekaran, P; Malathy, R
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: In this study, fly ash from thermal power plant was used as adsorbent for dye effluent emitted from textile processing industries. Sludge [colour adsorbed fly ash (CAF)] from packed column was used to replace cement in different proportions inconcrete. CAF concrete was not found equal to strength of conventional concrete but it was above the standard level and comparable. Durability test gave satisfactory results.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 235-239</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manufacturing rigid board by packaging waste containing aluminum and polyethylene</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11092</link>
      <description>Title: Manufacturing rigid board by packaging waste containing aluminum and polyethylene
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Hidalgo, M
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This study presents feasibility of using recycled low density polyethylene (LDPE) and aluminum of Tetra Pak to manufacture composite rigid board using a hot press. Compounds of LDPE / Al were significantly affected by the effect of compaction pressure during processing, especially in tensile strength and water absorption. Composite presents low water absorption, and acceptable tensile strength.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 232-234</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluation of radon exhalation rate from granite stone</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11091</link>
      <description>Title: Evaluation of radon exhalation rate from granite stone
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Nassiri, P; Ebrahimi, H; Shalkouhi, P Jafari
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This study evaluates radon exhalation rate from 10 different granite stones, used for building construction in Iran.Radon exhalation rate ranged from non-detectable to 0.6 Bq m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; h&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;. Six samples had exhalation rate above detectable level. Asignificant statistical relationship between radon exhalation rate with &lt;sup&gt;226&lt;/sup&gt;Ra and &lt;sup&gt;232&lt;/sup&gt;Th indicated that &lt;sup&gt;226&lt;/sup&gt;Ra and &lt;sup&gt;232&lt;/sup&gt;Th wereresponsible for radon exhalation from granite stones.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 230-231</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

