<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>NISCAIR Online Periodicals Repository Community:  Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR)</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/45</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18377" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18376" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18375" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18374" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  
  <textInput>
    <title>The Community's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18377">
    <title>&lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN"&gt;Entertainment Network&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-IN"&gt; v &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;Super Cassette Industries&lt;/i&gt;: Compulsory Licensing in the Copyright Demystified &lt;/span&gt;</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18377</link>
    <description>Title: &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-IN"&gt;Entertainment Network&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-IN"&gt; v &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;Super Cassette Industries&lt;/i&gt;: Compulsory Licensing in the Copyright Demystified &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Singh, Himanshu Raman; Singh, Preetesh Raman
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: &lt;span style="mso-bidi-language:AR-SA" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Compulsory licences&#xD;
are exceptions to the exclusive rights of the copyright holders. If&#xD;
monopolistic conduct or exclusionary conduct of the licensor is observed, then&#xD;
it will create anti-competition in the market and kill potential. If these&#xD;
copyright holders by the exercise of their right refuse to communicate or&#xD;
withhold their work from public then it will affect public interest. India is a&#xD;
developing country, her economic, social and educational developments have to&#xD;
be accelerated and not retarded. Public interest cannot be put on stake just&#xD;
for the profit of one person. The Supreme Court’s decision in &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"&gt;Entertainment&#xD;
Network (India)&#xD;
Ltd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt; v &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-weight:&#xD;
bold"&gt;Super Cassette Industries Ltd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-weight:&#xD;
bold"&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"&gt; can be rendered as&#xD;
an epoch-making case in the field of intellectual property&lt;b&gt;.&lt;/b&gt; The case became&#xD;
all the more important as it involved wide ranging issues like interpretation&#xD;
of Section 31 of the Copyright Act and the purposive interpretation placed on&#xD;
it treading on a thin line balancing the public interest with commercial&#xD;
interest. The radio industry in India&#xD;
is one of the booming sectors. Out of 139 music companies around 69 are private&#xD;
radio stations.&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; This paper reviews and critiques the decision in&#xD;
the case alongwith the law prevailing in other countries. This paper makes two&#xD;
important contributions bringing aspect of compulsory licences to the fore and&#xD;
providing step by step discussion on the above judgment. The paper also highlights&#xD;
anxiety of the industry and further suggests the way out of this.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 201-211</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18376">
    <title>Forward-Looking Valuation of Strategic Patent Portfolios Under Structural Uncertainty</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18376</link>
    <description>Title: Forward-Looking Valuation of Strategic Patent Portfolios Under Structural Uncertainty
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Collan, Mikael; Kyläheiko, Kalevi
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract:   Strategic patent portfolios are&#xD;
intangible assets that technology oriented companies hold to secure their&#xD;
competitive advantage in the future. Traditionally, valuation of&#xD;
forward-looking strategic patent portfolios is more an art than a science,&#xD;
nevertheless, they play an important role in the future competitive advantage&#xD;
positioning of high-tech oriented companies.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&#xD;
  This paper&#xD;
discusses forward-looking strategic patent portfolios and presents some new&#xD;
ideas on how numerical valuation methods could be used in framing the valuation&#xD;
of these portfolios. The basis on which the forward-looking far away from&#xD;
exploitation strategic patent portfolios are valued is crucially different from&#xD;
the valuation of ‘in production’ patents or already existing licensable IPRs,&#xD;
since future strategic patents must be based on vague information with&#xD;
structural uncertainty about the future. The authors show how flexible tools&#xD;
and analysis using the pay-off method can be used to solve these complex&#xD;
problems faced by companies; and illustrate the same using a numerical example.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 230-241</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18375">
    <title>Reputation Building to Reduce Risk of IP Litigation and Infringement Allegation</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18375</link>
    <description>Title: Reputation Building to Reduce Risk of IP Litigation and Infringement Allegation
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Qinghai, Li; Sizong, Wu; Chen, Shouming; Junzhe, Ji
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This paper explores why Chinese firms are&#xD;
easily subject to litigation and accusation of IP infringement, and how they&#xD;
can reduce these associated risks. The finding suggests that the negative&#xD;
reputation of IP abuses, penetration in high value-added area in terms of&#xD;
branding and R&amp;amp;D, entry in developed countries with sophisticated products,&#xD;
and passive response to litigation and allegation, are important reasons.&#xD;
Accordingly, a framework is proposed to stress well-intended reputation&#xD;
building for avoidance of litigation and allegation. Three strategies are&#xD;
recommended to build reputation: getting technology and IP with joint venture&#xD;
and acquisition, getting technology and IP with R&amp;amp;D and patent application,&#xD;
and toughness against litigation. Five Chinese case firms are used to&#xD;
illustrate these strategies. It seems to be the first study to incorporate&#xD;
reputation into IP defensive strategies, and therefore has great implications&#xD;
for firms from emerging economies which attempt to upgrade from&#xD;
labour-intensive to R&amp;amp;D and brand intensive enterprises.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 259-271</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18374">
    <title>TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: The Post Doha Crises</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/18374</link>
    <description>Title: TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: The Post Doha Crises
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Agitha, T G
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Though&#xD;
the Doha Declaration on TRIPS Agreement and Public Health has clarified that&#xD;
public health has predominance over private commercial interests, the victory&#xD;
of public health over trade interests appears to be momentary. The big&#xD;
pharmaceutical industries and the developed countries, using trade sanctions,&#xD;
effectively prevented developing countries from making full use of the&#xD;
flexibilities in the TRIPS Agreement procured by the Doha Declaration.&#xD;
Ultimately free trade agreements are made use of by developed countries to&#xD;
impose TRIPS plus obligations on developing countries. These developments once&#xD;
again ascertain that trade forum has its limits in protecting public health interests&#xD;
against trade interests.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Page(s): 287-293</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

